Scientists have been speaking about how regulation to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions needs to be comprehensive to work. Unfortunately, Obama folded to the Big Ag lobby on one of the most significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions :
THE INFLUENCE GAME: Excuse me! Lobby wins on burps – AP
One contributor to global warming — bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants — is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Belching from the nation’s 170 million cattle, sheep and pigs produces about one-quarter of the methane released in the U.S. each year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. That makes the hoofed critters the largest source of the heat-trapping gas.
June 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM
The cattle industry managed to make this into a big joke — cow farts are endangered the plant? ! Ha Ha!
As the article says cattle produce a lot of methane.
It’s not a CO2 problem. Methane by weight is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2.
Many members of congress haven’t even bothered to find out the difference.
June 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM
I’ve noticed that Obama’s grandiose plans are prone to change whenever anyone objects. Oh, yeah… anyone with money, that is,
June 21, 2009 at 11:05 PM
It’s unfortunate, including livestock production within these regulations, but perhaps exempting operations that made some attemp – such as retrofitting the facilities with anaerobic digestors that capture much of the gas & waste & burn it as fuel for power – might have been a wonderful way to push that efficiency along & capture economic & social value out of so much waste that’s generated in this country.
June 22, 2009 at 8:57 AM
Heaven forbid that anyone in the US should be encouraged to change their wasteful habits/practices for the benefit of anyone other than themselves…. Maybe that should be a question; Does heaven forbid…?
June 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Amazing how much power the myth of the rancher and the cowboy still has in the political world. I wonder if someone has done a comparison between bison and cows in terms of methane; the figures might buttress the argument to get these belching creatures off public lands, at least.
Maybe it will come down to obesity issues, and Americans deciding that if they are going to eat red meat, they will eat alternative red meats like bison, or they will choose to eat grass fed and finished local beef, forcing the industry to make some tough decisions. If you can’t go through the front door, maybe a side door will do as well.
November 3, 2009 at 11:41 AM
[…] US House passes amendment banning measurement of livestock-related global warming gases November 3, 2009 — Brian Ertz We’ve talked about how despite Hamburgers being the ‘Hummers’ of Food in Global Warming, and How Meat, Especially Beef Contributes to Global Warming, big agribusiness and the livestock industry flex their political muscle and are exempted from meaningful regulation every time (like on the Climate Bill). […]