Alan Gregory’s Conservation News- Marine life on a warming planet
- Oklahoma, where the denial comes right before the drought
- Plants will be hard put to handle greenhouse gases, scientists say
- The quote of the week
- Appeal filed over Blair Mountain strip mining in W.Va.
- Dr. James Hansen: Climate change is happening now
- The pledge of wildlands
- Prairie dog disease confirmed in South Dakota
- NASA: Ice sheet decline at both poles increasing
- An area of Arctic ice bigger than the U.S. melted this year
Native Carnivores are scared from Parks by even quiet human use
July 22, 2008 — Ralph Maughan4 Responses to “Native Carnivores are scared from Parks by even quiet human use”
Recent comments
william huard on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… Ryan on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… william huard on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… WM on Megaloads video: Giant rig opp… Ryan on Coyotes nail dog during Colora… jdubya on Megaloads video: Giant rig opp… JEFF E on Have you come across any inter… JB on Republican’s Climate Solution:… william huard on Have you come across any inter… Peter Kiermeir on Have you come across any inter… - Buffalo Field Campaign Blog
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Demarcated Landscapes
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
The Wildlife News 
July 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM
This is not exactly a shocker, but it makes the bubble-heads on what George Weurthner calls “thrill craft” look extra stupid.
Ten or twenty years ago, Yellowstone National Park bear guru Kerry Gunther sat up on the Pelican Cone fire lookout and documented that more hikers in Pelican Valley = less grizzly bears. As more and more hikers entered the valley during the day, the bears retreated. This is a tiny part of the justification for seasonal closures of big chunks of Yellowstone’s backcountry.
Meanwhile, bubbleheads on snowmobiles insist, “our obnoxious presence doesn’t scare grizzly bears away from prime riparian habitat along the Yellowstone and Firehole Rivers, nor does our presence stop grizzlies from feeding on elk and bison carcasses–and we can prove it. We don’t see any bears.”
Duh!!!!
4-wheelers and dolts on jet skis use the same “logic” to prove they don’t disturb wildlife.
July 24, 2008 at 8:55 AM
In Oregon there is a relatively healthy courgar population, and we are told by the Fish & Wildlife folks, that lions are dispersing–from the Cascade mountains– into rural-urban interface areas and, therefore, they need to be controlled. I do a lot of hiking year round, and in the winter (snow) when it is easier to locate tracks I find a lot of sign along trails & such. In the summer, along some of the popular trails, I find a lot of scat. I do not question the findings of this study but am curious as to how this will play out We also read about cougars expanding east into more populated regions and about courgars & coyotes in the LA area?????
July 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM
Do we have any idea to what degree of public use causes damage, and likewise to what degree taking pets, particularly dogs and/or horses causes more of an issue.
The author of the article puts it well that these results are somewhat troublesome since most of us love to be in the back country. I’m not intimately familiar with Califoria parks, are these mostly near the San Fran population corridor, that might reflect more volume than an area such as Idaho or western Montana
Dave Smith’s comment on snowmobiles is dead on. There are few scourges worse than these and other ATV’s on public land that disgust me. Anyone else ever tried to snowshoe or cross country ski when these nemesis are present? The air gags you and the pollutants are visible on the snow.
July 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM
Ed, it is my understanding ~ someone correct me if I’m wrong ~ that deer and elk will *generally* avoid areas in which domestic dogs have defecated or urinated because they can’t distinguish between domestic dog waste and wolf waste.
Mack P. Bray
Wildlife Watchers