There are now two lawsuits against the rule governing the Mexican wolf restoration
May 2, 2008 — Ralph MaughanSecond Suit In 2 Days Targets Wolf Program. By Rene Romo. ABQJournal Southern Bureau
Second Suit In 2 Days Targets Wolf Program. By Rene Romo. ABQJournal Southern Bureau
WildEarth Guardians and The Rewilding Institute sue on the failing Mexican wolf program. Wild Again. By Rob Edward.
Two prominent regional groups have merged to form WildEarth Guardians.
Here is the generic AP story. Green groups combine efforts.
Here is the longer story as written on Wild Again (Sinapu’s blog). Conservation Groups Merge To Create a Force of Nature for the American West’s Wild Places, Wildlife and Wild Rivers.
On National Public Radio, this is mostly audio, Government Revisits Contested [Mexican] Wolf Recovery Plan. By Ted Robbins.
For those who like it by ear, this is an overview of the current controversy, government efforts for a better plan, and the incipient failure of the Mexican wolf restoration.
Conservation groups have taken action after the story about ranch hands luring wolves in so they will kill calves, so the wolves will then killed by the government “to protect the livestock.”
For Immediate Release, January 3, 2008
Contact: Michael Robinson, (575) 534-0360
Conservationists Request Investigations of Reported Wolf Baiting
SILVER CITY, N.M.— Fifteen conservation groups wrote Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne today requesting an independent inspector general investigation into a reported baiting of endangered Mexican gray wolves. The baiting scheme, in which vulnerable cattle were allegedly left near a wolf den, resulted in a rare wolf being shot by the federal government.
The letter to Kempthorne states in part: “The possibility that illegal take was perpetrated through abuse of government-provided telemetry radio receivers and through taking advantage of SOP 13, the rigid predator-control protocol applied to Mexican wolves, merits thorough investigation.”
Conservationists are also requesting a law enforcement investigation, retrieval of radio telemetry receivers that may be used to facilitate illegal baiting, and release back into the wild of trapped wolves that may also have been baited on the same ranch. In addition, in separate letters to the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, the concerned groups request the cancelation of grazing permits.
According to the December 24, 2007 High Country News article that broke the wolf-baiting story, ranch employee Mike Miller “branded cattle less than a half-mile from the wolves’ den, the enticing aroma of seared flesh surely reaching the pack’s super-sensitive nostrils. Miller was, in essence, offering up a cow as a sacrifice.” In fact, the article quotes Miller as saying: “We would sacrifice a calf to get a third strike” — referring to depredations in the so-called “three-strikes-and-you’re-out” rule governing the Mexican wolves, formally known as SOP 13. Miller is quoted in a subsequent Albuquerque Journal article as denying that he made such an admission.
The conservationists’ letters specifically seek the following actions:
Michael J. Robinson
Center for Biological Diversity
P.O. Box 53166
Pinos Altos, NM 88053
(575) 534-0360
Here is the letter to the Secretary of Interior (Dirk Kempthorne)
kempthorne-wolfbaiting-20081.pdf
- - - - -
Update: Story in the ABQ Journal-News. Conservationists Want Probe Into Reports of Wolf Baiting
This long story below in High Country News describes an illegal tactics being used to make sure the “dangerous” dozen or so Mexican wolves in this lawless county don’t fare well. Last chance for the Lobo. John Dougherty. High Country News.
The federal government should step up, pull grazing permits, take away radio telemetry, and make sure their personnel are protected. This isn’t just about wolves, it is about a place in New Mexico which for years has been allowed to violate the wildlife and public land laws of the United States and New Mexico, abuse your public land, and get away with it.
I first learned about Catron County in the 1990s when they were in the news for violating grazing laws and asserting the bullshit doctrine of country supremacy to the laws of the United States. An “environmentalist” who had stood up to the local strongarm tactics attended a political science conference in Colorado Springs. She gave a presentation on the lawlessness of the area. She actually had to live in a safe house.
Presidential candidate Bill Richardson, governor of New Mexico, would do well to send sufficient law enforcement into the area to maintain order and restore the rule of law.
News Release from the Center for Biological Diversity asking for action.
Ranch hand disputes claim that he lured endangered wolf. Fox11AZ.com
This is exactly what I think needs to be said. Finally someone realized that preventing extinction of this small wolf is more important than the cows, whose owners lose little if anything.
Let wolves prosper. Editorial. Arizona Republic.
Currently on the brink of failure due to low population numbers and excessive killing due to alleged conflicts with livestock, the rule governing the management of the Mexican wolves is being updated and your comments are needed. Right now they are in the part of the NEPA process called “scoping” — to determine the scope and range of issues and opportunities.
Here is the notice in the Federal Register.
Defenders of Wildlife is recommending the following changes:
Allow wolves to roam beyond the current artificial boundaries to find suitable habitat and prey.
• Resolve livestock-wolf conflicts in ways that keep wolves in the wild and achieve progress toward reintroduction objectives.
• Revise the service’s 25-year-old recovery plan.
• Allow opportunities to expand wolf reintroduction to other areas in the future.
Your comments are due Dec. 31. You can email them in to: r2fwe_al@fws.gov
Defenders page on “recovery of the Lobo“
Western Watersheds Project on commenting on the Mexican wolf.
Mexican wolf population statistics (government page)